cuspera logo CUSPERA

Xactly Incent vs Performio: 2024 Ultimate Comparison Guide

Comparison Summary

This comparison report of Xactly Incent vs. Performio is based on a specific set of business needs and context. The comparison uses 7298 Cuspera insights based on peer reviews, case studies, testimonials, and expert opinions across 50+ sources.

Introducing Xactly Incent and Performio

Xactly Incent, Performio, Xactly SimplyComp, Xactly Benchmarking, etc., belong to a category of solutions that help Incentives and Compensation Management. Different products excel in different areas, so the best platform for your business will depend on your specific needs and requirements.

Xactly Incent covers Sales Commission Management, Sales Incentive Management, Performance Management, Workflow Management, etc.

Performio focuses on Sales Commission Management, Sales Incentive Management, Performance Management, Workflow Management with Chat, etc.

"We have Xactly Premium [PLUS] Support ; the individuals we have supporting us are highly engaged and respond immediately. We feel like Premium [PLUS] Support is the smartest thing we have ever done " - Rodahl Leong-Lyons

"The team at Performio has exceeded our expectations at every turn. Having been through an end to end rollout of their software through many parts of our business, they have consistently delivered and added value to our incentive management process, ...ensuring we're measuring the right things and rewarding our staff appropriately. " - Ian Calpin

Unsure which of these solutions is right for you? Our Cuspera AI engine can compare them based on your needs and specific to your industry and context. Get your personalized report today.


logo Xactly Incent

Focus area

Xactly Incent is better than Performio for

Software Failure Risk

  • medium

logo Performio

Focus area

Software Failure Risk

  • low

About

Incentive Compensation Management Software for complex enterprises in driving sales behaviors

Sales management software to easily and quickly calculate sales commissions.

Age

2005

Financials

M&A

PRIVATE

Business Need

Total Processes
(we found evidences for)

24

36

Total Goals
(we found evidences for)

6

10

Top Processes

Evidences indicate better relative satisfaction


sales commission management


sales incentive management


performance management


workflow management


sales review & feedback



competitive intelligence


revenue cycle management


sales quota management


sales document management

contract management


training & onboarding


engagement management


knowledge management



motivation management


billing and invoice management


loyalty management





communication management


helpdesk management


social media analytics


social media management

social media analytics


campaign management


customer feedback management



Top Goals

Goals Achieved

  • Increase sales & revenue

  • Scale best practices

  • Improve visibility

  • Improve efficiency

  • Enhance customer relationships

  • Improve ROI

  • See 3 more
  • Increase sales & revenue

  • Improve visibility

  • Scale best practices

  • Improve ROI

  • Enter new markets internationally or locally

  • Launch new products

  • Improve efficiency

  • Acquire customers

  • Grow market share

  • Improve stakeholder relations

  • See 7 more

Top Channels

Channels Used

  • offline

  • chat

  • phone calls

  • events

  • trade shows

  • channel partners

  • social media

  • point of sale

  • mobile

  • See 6 more
  • offline

  • chat

  • phone calls

  • events

  • trade shows

  • channel partners

  • social media

  • point of sale

  • mobile

  • See 6 more

Failure Risk Guidance Security Report?

Low Medium High
Low Medium High

Compliance Risk

low

{{{rsh_C_1}}}

low

{{{rsh_C_1}}}

Security & Privacy Risk

medium

{{{rsh_C_1}}}

medium

{{{rsh_C_1}}}

Integration Risk

medium

{{{rsh_C_1}}}

low

{{{rsh_C_1}}}

Migration Risk

medium

{{{rsh_C_1}}}

low

{{{rsh_C_1}}}

Business Setting