cuspera logo CUSPERA

Compare RingCentral Video vs StarLeaf Platform

Comparison Summary

This comparison report of RingCentral Video vs. StarLeaf Platform is based on a specific set of business needs and context. The comparison uses 2395 Cuspera insights based on peer reviews, case studies, testimonials, and expert opinions across 50+ sources.

Introducing RingCentral Video and StarLeaf Platform

RingCentral Video, StarLeaf Platform, TeamViewer Meeting, NTT Cloud UC (formerly Arkadin Anywhere), etc., belong to a category of solutions that help Webinar and Conferencing. Different products excel in different areas, so the best platform for your business will depend on your specific needs and requirements.

RingCentral Video covers Collaboration with Video, Communication Management, Content Management, Sales Document Management, etc.

StarLeaf Platform focuses on Collaboration with Video, Conference Call Management with Offline, Content Management with Video, Sales Call Management with Phone Calls, etc.

"Because RingCentral Video works anywhere, we can have a field tech on their mobile phone at one of our neighborhoods, sharing a live video of an access panel or security camera. It’s like a real-time troubleshooting session, and it definitely helps ...us solve problems faster. " - Elliot Hamby

"StarLeaf makes it possible for our students to interpret real, live events using the same technology they will use in the real world. When they graduate and look for a job, they will have a distinct competitive advantage over other candidates. " - Aladin Alaily

Unsure which of these solutions is right for you? Our Cuspera AI engine can compare them based on your needs and specific to your industry and context. Get your personalized report today.


logo RingCentral Video

Focus area

RingCentral Video is better than StarLeaf Platform for

Software Failure Risk

  • medium

logo StarLeaf Platform

Focus area

Software Failure Risk

  • low

About

Free and unlimited online video meetings

Simple enterprise video for meeting and chat.

Age

2003

Financials

IPO

PRIVATE

Business Need

Total Processes
(we found evidences for)

52

34

Total Goals
(we found evidences for)

11

7

Top Processes

Evidences indicate better relative satisfaction



communication management

sending & publishing communications



engagement management

engaging and following up


sales document management

contract management


workflow management


calendar management


conference call management


sales call management

meeting management


training & onboarding


contact list management


helpdesk management


social media management

social media analytics




business development



campaign management


sales review & feedback




category management



lead qualification

lead qualification: technographic


Top Goals

Goals Achieved

  • Improve internal communications

  • Improve efficiency

  • Improve digital and social presence

  • Acquire customers

  • Increase sales & revenue

  • Grow market share

  • Enhance customer relationships

  • Improve ROI

  • Enter new markets internationally or locally

  • Manage risk

  • Scale best practices

  • See 8 more
  • Enhance customer relationships

  • Improve internal communications

  • Acquire customers

  • Launch new products

  • Increase sales & revenue

  • Enter new markets internationally or locally

  • Scale best practices

  • See 4 more

Top Channels

Channels Used

  • video

  • phone calls

  • offline

  • events

  • trade shows

  • chat

  • website

  • mobile

  • e-mail

  • Skype

  • on premises

  • Slack

  • mobile app

  • support groups

  • See 11 more
  • video

  • phone calls

  • offline

  • events

  • trade shows

  • chat

  • website

  • mobile

  • e-mail

  • Skype

  • on premises

  • Slack

  • mobile app

  • support groups

  • See 11 more

Failure Risk Guidance Security Report?

Low Medium High
Low Medium High

Compliance Risk

low

{{{rsh_C_1}}}

low

{{{rsh_C_1}}}

Security & Privacy Risk

medium

{{{rsh_C_1}}}

low

{{{rsh_C_1}}}

Integration Risk

medium

{{{rsh_C_1}}}

low

{{{rsh_C_1}}}

Migration Risk

medium

{{{rsh_C_1}}}

low

{{{rsh_C_1}}}

Business Setting