cuspera logo CUSPERA

Compare Xactly Benchmarking vs Xactly Commission Expense Accounting

Comparison Summary

This comparison report of Xactly Benchmarking vs. Xactly Commission Expense Accounting is based on a specific set of business needs and context. The comparison uses 2893 Cuspera insights based on peer reviews, case studies, testimonials, and expert opinions across 50+ sources.

Introducing Xactly Benchmarking and Xactly Commission Expense Accounting

Xactly Benchmarking, Xactly Commission Expense Accounting, Xactly Incent, Performio, etc., belong to a category of solutions that help Incentives and Compensation Management. Different products excel in different areas, so the best platform for your business will depend on your specific needs and requirements.

Xactly Benchmarking covers Performance Management, Forecasting with User Generated Content, Sales Incentive Management, Public Relations, etc.

Xactly Commission Expense Accounting focuses on Sales Commission Management, Account Management, Sales Document Management, Performance Management, etc.

"It's more than calculating commissions...it's inspiring a sales force to be the best they can be. We use Xactly to inspire performance. " - Justin Ritchie

"It's more than calculating commissions...it's inspiring a sales force to be the best they can be. We use Xactly to inspire performance. " - Justin Ritchie

Unsure which of these solutions is right for you? Our Cuspera AI engine can compare them based on your needs and specific to your industry and context. Get your personalized report today.


logo Xactly Benchmarking

Focus area

Xactly Benchmarking is better than Xactly Commission Expense Accounting for

Software Failure Risk

  • low

logo Xactly Commission Expense Accounting

Focus area

Software Failure Risk

  • medium

About

Measure Plan and Performance Data Across Teams and Industry to proactively monitor and build incentive compensation programs.

Commission Expense Accounting & Revenue Recognition Software to ensure compliance with the latest ASC 606/IFRS 15 standards.

Age

2005

2005

Financials

M&A

M&A

Business Need

Total Processes
(we found evidences for)

71

27

Total Goals
(we found evidences for)

15

10

Top Processes

Evidences indicate better relative satisfaction


performance management



sales incentive management



competitive intelligence



engagement management

engaging and following up


motivation management


sales commission management



social media management

social media analytics


lead qualification

lead qualification: technographic


communication management

sending & publishing communications


campaign management


revenue cycle management


generation of new leads


customer feedback management

measuring customer satisfaction


sales document management

proposal & quote management

contract management


workflow management



training & onboarding


content management


account management


loyalty management



merger and acquisition


conversion management


products & pricelist management


helpdesk management




lifetime value management



pipeline management




Top Goals

Goals Achieved

  • Increase sales & revenue

  • Improve efficiency

  • Scale best practices

  • Enter new markets internationally or locally

  • Improve ROI

  • Acquire customers

  • Establish thought leadership

  • Manage risk

  • Grow market share

  • Improve visibility

  • Enhance customer relationships

  • Launch new products

  • Improve internal communications

  • Improve stakeholder relations

  • Shorten ramp up time

  • See 12 more
  • Increase sales & revenue

  • Scale best practices

  • Improve efficiency

  • Improve ROI

  • Enhance customer relationships

  • Enter new markets internationally or locally

  • Acquire customers

  • Grow market share

  • Improve visibility

  • Establish thought leadership

  • See 7 more

Top Channels

Channels Used

  • phone calls

  • user generated content

  • blogs

  • print media

  • magazine

  • chat

  • See 3 more
  • phone calls

  • user generated content

  • blogs

  • print media

  • magazine

  • chat

  • See 3 more

Failure Risk Guidance Security Report?

Low Medium High
Low Medium High

Compliance Risk

low

{{{rsh_C_1}}}

medium

{{{rsh_C_1}}}

Security & Privacy Risk

medium

{{{rsh_C_1}}}

medium

{{{rsh_C_1}}}

Integration Risk

low

{{{rsh_C_1}}}

medium

{{{rsh_C_1}}}

Migration Risk

medium

{{{rsh_C_1}}}

medium

{{{rsh_C_1}}}

Business Setting