cuspera logo CUSPERA

Compare Xactly SimplyComp vs Xactly Commission Expense Accounting

Comparison Summary

This comparison report of Xactly SimplyComp vs. Xactly Commission Expense Accounting is based on a specific set of business needs and context. The comparison uses 1228 Cuspera insights based on peer reviews, case studies, testimonials, and expert opinions across 50+ sources.

Introducing Xactly SimplyComp and Xactly Commission Expense Accounting

Xactly SimplyComp, Xactly Commission Expense Accounting, CaptivateIQ, QCommission, etc., belong to a category of solutions that help Incentives and Compensation Management. Different products excel in different areas, so the best platform for your business will depend on your specific needs and requirements.

Xactly SimplyComp covers Sales Commission Management, Performance Management, Sales Incentive Management, Helpdesk Management, etc.

Xactly Commission Expense Accounting focuses on Sales Commission Management, Account Management, Sales Document Management, Performance Management, etc.

"Working at a global company like Western Union, managing compensation is very interesting. Using Xactly has allowed us to be dynamic in that regard and meet the needs of all our managers across the globe " - Joshua Baxter

"We have Xactly Premium [PLUS] Support ; the individuals we have supporting us are highly engaged and respond immediately. We feel like Premium [PLUS] Support is the smartest thing we have ever done. " - Rodahl Leong-Lyons

Unsure which of these solutions is right for you? Our Cuspera AI engine can compare them based on your needs and specific to your industry and context. Get your personalized report today.


logo Xactly SimplyComp

Focus area

Software Failure Risk

  • medium

logo Xactly Commission Expense Accounting

Focus area

Software Failure Risk

  • medium

About

Automated and simplified Incentive Compensation Management (ICM) for Growing Companies

Commission Expense Accounting & Revenue Recognition Software to ensure compliance with the latest ASC 606/IFRS 15 standards.

Age

2005

2005

Financials

M&A

M&A

Business Need

Total Processes
(we found evidences for)

33

27

Total Goals
(we found evidences for)

7

10

Top Processes

Evidences indicate better relative satisfaction


sales commission management


performance management


sales incentive management


helpdesk management


engagement management

engaging and following up


lead qualification

lead qualification: behavioural


social media management

social media analytics


sales document management

contract management


account management


relationship management



workflow management


competitive intelligence



revenue cycle management




Top Goals

Goals Achieved

  • Scale best practices

  • Increase sales & revenue

  • Improve stakeholder relations

  • Improve efficiency

  • Improve ROI

  • Grow market share

  • Shorten ramp up time

  • See 4 more
  • Increase sales & revenue

  • Scale best practices

  • Improve efficiency

  • Improve ROI

  • Enhance customer relationships

  • Enter new markets internationally or locally

  • Acquire customers

  • Grow market share

  • Improve visibility

  • Establish thought leadership

  • See 7 more

Top Channels

Channels Used

  • phone calls

  • user generated content

  • blogs

  • print media

  • magazine

  • chat

  • See 3 more
  • phone calls

  • user generated content

  • blogs

  • print media

  • magazine

  • chat

  • See 3 more

Failure Risk Guidance Security Report?

Low Medium High
Low Medium High

Compliance Risk

medium

{{{rsh_C_1}}}

medium

{{{rsh_C_1}}}

Security & Privacy Risk

medium

{{{rsh_C_1}}}

medium

{{{rsh_C_1}}}

Integration Risk

low

{{{rsh_C_1}}}

medium

{{{rsh_C_1}}}

Migration Risk

medium

{{{rsh_C_1}}}

medium

{{{rsh_C_1}}}

Business Setting