cuspera logo CUSPERA

Compare SAP Commissions vs Xactly Commission Expense Accounting

Comparison Summary

This comparison report of SAP Commissions vs. Xactly Commission Expense Accounting is based on a specific set of business needs and context. The comparison uses 1439 Cuspera insights based on peer reviews, case studies, testimonials, and expert opinions across 50+ sources.

Introducing SAP Commissions and Xactly Commission Expense Accounting

SAP Commissions, Xactly Commission Expense Accounting, QCommission, Performio, etc., belong to a category of solutions that help Incentives and Compensation Management. Different products excel in different areas, so the best platform for your business will depend on your specific needs and requirements.

SAP Commissions covers Sales Commission Management, Sales Incentive Management, Sales Document Management, Social Media Management, etc.

Xactly Commission Expense Accounting focuses on Sales Commission Management, Account Management, Sales Document Management, Performance Management, etc.

"We took a top-down and bottom-up approachto rolling out our advisor and customer facing platform (with SAP Commissions and Producer Pro integrated), collecting feedback from early rollouts on use cases, nuances in commissionable events, and producti...vity gains. " - Bharat Rao

"It's more than calculating commissions...it's inspiring a sales force to be the best they can be. We use Xactly to inspire performance. " - Justin Ritchie

Unsure which of these solutions is right for you? Our Cuspera AI engine can compare them based on your needs and specific to your industry and context. Get your personalized report today.


logo SAP Commissions

Focus area

Software Failure Risk

  • medium

logo Xactly Commission Expense Accounting

Focus area

Software Failure Risk

  • medium

About

Maximize sales performance to drive profitable behaviors and grow revenue.

Commission Expense Accounting & Revenue Recognition Software to ensure compliance with the latest ASC 606/IFRS 15 standards.

Age

1972

2005

Financials

IPO

M&A

Business Need

Total Processes
(we found evidences for)

35

27

Total Goals
(we found evidences for)

8

10

Top Processes

Evidences indicate better relative satisfaction


sales commission management


sales incentive management


social media management

social media analytics


sales document management

proposal & quote management

contract management


workflow management


helpdesk management


communication management

sending & publishing communications


customer feedback management



motivation management


performance management


pipeline management


engagement management

engaging and following up


content management



distribution management



competitive intelligence


account management


revenue cycle management




Top Goals

Goals Achieved

  • Increase sales & revenue

  • Improve efficiency

  • Improve ROI

  • Scale best practices

  • Enter new markets internationally or locally

  • Improve consistency

  • Enhance customer relationships

  • Improve internal communications

  • See 5 more
  • Increase sales & revenue

  • Scale best practices

  • Improve efficiency

  • Improve ROI

  • Enhance customer relationships

  • Enter new markets internationally or locally

  • Acquire customers

  • Grow market share

  • Improve visibility

  • Establish thought leadership

  • See 7 more

Top Channels

Channels Used

  • phone calls

  • user generated content

  • blogs

  • print media

  • magazine

  • chat

  • See 3 more
  • phone calls

  • user generated content

  • blogs

  • print media

  • magazine

  • chat

  • See 3 more

Failure Risk Guidance Security Report?

Low Medium High
Low Medium High

Compliance Risk

low

{{{rsh_C_1}}}

medium

{{{rsh_C_1}}}

Security & Privacy Risk

medium

{{{rsh_C_1}}}

medium

{{{rsh_C_1}}}

Integration Risk

medium

{{{rsh_C_1}}}

medium

{{{rsh_C_1}}}

Migration Risk

medium

{{{rsh_C_1}}}

medium

{{{rsh_C_1}}}

Business Setting